Monday, November 30, 2009
good guide.com guides us
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Friends of the environment?
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Giving up texting
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
old cell phones???
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Humans Responsible for Bird Strikes!!
Plane crashes with birds have been documented since the beginning of aviation, and the first fatal accident occurred as early as 1912. However, with more and more passengers wanting to fly (talk about Jevons Paradox gone wild), business and tourism travel skyrocketing even in the wake of the 9/11 attacks there are ever more planes flying in the sky. According to the FAA since 2000 there have been over 486 cases involving planes hitting birds. 166 of those involved emergency landings, and 66 in aborted take-offs. In 1990 there was one strike per 10,000 flights, in 2007 there are three.
Of course, this whole thing is not the birds’ fault. Its humans. Aviation pundits say that it’s the conservation movements’ fault, since now that the birds have safe areas to breed in their numbers rise. But really the problem is much deeper than that. Human expansion patterns usually result in the destruction of forested land and the creation of suburban sprawl. Guess what happens? Well, the smaller birds like songbirds, meadowlarks, and bobtails that live in the forests generally stay away from planes and do not fly high. They stick to the forests. But when the forests are cut down and replaced with suburbia, new species replaces them- species like gulls, geese, pigeons, and turkey vultures. These species adapt to suburbia, (vultures eat roadkill, pigeons eat garbage), and worse yet they have no problem settling next to airports to nest. The vast majority of plane-bird strikes occur with these so called “big birds”. No, they are not yellow.
At airports like New York’s JFK and laguardia, this problem is especially pronounced since the airports are next the ocean, at a nexus of “big bird” migratory flight paths. Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge is only a few miles from JFK airport. Officials have come up with interesting ways to make sure the birds don’t meet the planes. They use falcons and dogs to practice “bird control”; they allow red-tailed hawks to nest near runways, since these hawks chase other birds away and run away from planes. But ultimately, there is no stopping the flocks of geese and vultures from staying around these airports. Perhaps if we kept the land around the area wooded in its natural state, we wouldn’t have to deal with flocks of kamikaze meat. Unfortunately, on Long Island at least the suburbanization is so profound that it is highly unlikely any major changes can be made. But this should be a lesson for other airports and the aviation industry in general: don’t have suburban sprawl next to your airports- rather, keep the place wooded. Not only it may help a bit with recycling carbon (considering major airports, probably not much), but the forests will also prevent major catastrophes from occurring because of the existence of bird flocks.
References:
Bird Strikes. New York Times Authors Blog.
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/dont-blame-mother-nature-for-the-crash/
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/nyregion/16strike.html?_r=1
Monday, November 23, 2009
Green In the Media
In my opinion solar panels are the way to go. I had taken Consequences of Global Climate Change here with professor George Robinson and he showed us a map in class of Arizona with a tiny red square over a small portion of the desert. He explained that if this small red space was covered with solar panels that it cause generate enough electricity for our whole country. I no longer can find this map on ERES unfortunately. I understand that the tiny dot is probably thousands of square miles of solar panels. But if we developed solar panel plants all over the south in the U.S. we could accomplish this goal. I understand we're talking about billions of dollars. But the government should start to build these plants with the huge government budget. This would decrease our dependence on foreign oil imports and would give us practically no reason to be over in the middle east wasting our money on wars. Use the money for a beneficial cause!
Source:http://current.com/items/91511336_al-gore-on-30-rock.htm (NBC's 30 Rock)
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Are the Oceans Absorbing Emissions Like They Used To?
Source:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/science/earth/19oceans.html?_r=1&ref=earth
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Using condoms the answer?
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Michelle Obama
Drinking Seawater...?
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_osmosis#Desalination
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Cigarette Butts Everywhere
Wasting Water
Michelle Obama
Shake Us Off
Massive "eco-tower" in Shanghai
Interesting news- a giant tower being planned in Shanghai, China, is considered to be the latest “green building” scheme to be planned for the People’s Republic. Known as the ‘Pearl River Tower’, it is planned to soar 71 stories into the grey polluted skies of Shanghai harbor. According to the building’s architects, it will be “the most advanced in the world” of its kind.
Firstly, its shape is a curve facing prevailing winds, like a giant sail. According to its American architects, its design should increase wind speeds and direct them into slots in the building. Wind turbines will be located inside the building behind those slots, generating economically viable wind power. The architects claim that the building may generate as much energy as it uses. The cooling system, instead of using energy and space guzzling air ducts, uses a cool water system. The water flows through the building in ducts through concrete beams, saving not only energy but large amounts of space as well. The extra space will be used for turbines and offices. Other features include a wide-spaced double glazed wall that channels hot air upwards, and solar photovoltaics in the front of the building to collect solar energy. Finally, automatic control systems around the building make sure that power isn’t wasted by shutting down systems wasting energy.
Thinking about all that, that is a pretty impressive building. But of course, the costs are ridiculously high, so its unlikely that this can be reproduced on a mass-scale right now.
According to Amy Englehart, director of SOM’s East Asia office, this building, “could only have been commissioned in China”. This statement is unfortunately, an important reminder to the West that China is rapidly catching up to western standards and even surpassing them in some ways. While in the US “green buildings” can constitute any big box store than conserves a little more energy than its counterparts, true “green skyscrapers” are now being built in China’s coastal cities. US green construction companies often focus on redevelopment and refitting of old buildings rather than on designing entirely new buildings based on the concept of sustainability. Of course, for China it is easier to find the funds necessary for developing entirely new green infrastructure, since their economy has been in a “growth” phase in the last two decades. But for the US, wouldn’t it pay off to place the funds down now for new eco-buildings which will repay itself many times later? SOM, the Pearl Tower’s contractor company, has already expressed their belief that the extra investments in the Tower will start making money in five years’ time.
While sustainable cities can be achieved by refitting older buildings in the downtowns, preserving history and culture while saving energy and costs, China is pioneering the newer, more direct approach. By clearing out older buildings entirely, China is starting with a “tabula rasa” from which to construct sustainable cities. The effectiveness of this strategy will become more apparent after a decade of work, however. Another important point is that the Pearl River Tower is, the exception rather than the norm in China. For the moment, the Tower is one of the few green buildings being constructed in China. It can only be hoped that the Chinese government will encourage more eco-friendly buildings with the successful completion of the Pearl River Tower. The US should also bear this in mind. We should start putting money to similar projects, not only just to catch up with China but because it the long run it should pay off.
1. www.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8317211.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8317211.stm
10/28/2009
Interdependence II
i would say that it is an economic term as well as a biology term. you could say ants in an anthill are interdependent on each other, each being specialized for some function. Some are soldiers, some are foragers, some take care of the queen and some repair the nest. Human society has evolved to be a similar interdependent society, although we are many times more complex. In fact, it is likely that globalization will increase the rate at which we are interdependent on one another. Every global region is starting to become more "oriented" towards a particular economic outlet. For example, India in IT tech, China in manufacturing, south america in food production, etc. Specialization is no longer happening only on a personal or regional (intercity) scale, but now on a global scale. Although, some politicians say that this model does "put all the eggs in one basket", and are trying to create more mixed economies in their countries.
Cutting Down on Air Pollution Has Other Impacts
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/us/13water.html?ref=earth
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Interdependence
Immigration and the Workforce
Michelle Obama’s Plea for Education
After watching Michelle Obama’s Plea for Education at http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/lang/eng/michelle_obama.html I gained more respect for our First Lady of the United States. Although I may not be the biggest Obama enthusiast my passion for how Michelle feels about education is dead on. Sometimes people don’t realize how much a speech like this can have an affect on people. Fortunately I had the opportunity to see Colin Powell speak here at SUNY Albany this fall. After hearing such influential words from such a high end person, personally my beliefs were stimulated and I was encouraged and more motivated just by hearing him speak. I think it was great how Michelle spoke about her past and gave a little history about herself as well as her family. Most of us in this world were not born with everything and to hear how far a person has made it with having nothing, personally is very touching. It is very important for Michelle as well as speakers similar to her (like Colin Powell) to continue these speeches in order to encourage those listeners. Education is too important to fail to appreciate and seeing these people make a difference is really great.
why we need grandmothers
Immigration
Bipedalism
Moral justification
Several months after this destruction,"Indira Gandhi was assassinated in the garden of her residence in Delhi. Two of the Indian prime minister's security guards, both Sikhs, shot her as she walked towards an early morning interview with Peter Ustinov, who was filming a British television documentary".(http://networkedblogs.com/p17716462) In this Article, you can see the people that are destroying the shops and factories of Sikhs, don't think they are doing anything wrong. Also in this article Rajiv Gandhi, Indira's son, explained the riots after the death of this mother as "When a great tree falls, the earth shakes,".
The body guards that killed Indira Gandhi justified their actions because she gave the order to kill men Sikhs inside their holy land. Also Rajiv Gandhi justified the riots after the death of this mother as something that had to happen because they Sikhs killed the Indian Prime minister. Both sides are morally justified, and both parties and happy with their actions.
Do you know where your children are?
You’re a feminist and you don’t even know it
“The defined norm is a standard of ’rightness’ against which all others are judged, backed by institutional power, economic power, and both institutional and individual violence”(The Common Elements of Oppression, Q Diamond) Currently the defined norms are white, able-bodied young, Christian males and any deviation from this is considered the “other”. In addition, any deviation from the norm, lack institutional power and therefore are oppressed. Oppression constitutes many elements like economic power, privileges, violence and the threat of violence, invisibility, distortion of events, stereotyping, internalized oppression, isolation, assimilation and tokenism.
There are countless connections to Feminism and our class, People and Resources; unfortunately, no one person has blatantly made those connections. For example, one connection would refer to Andrew Szasz’s book Shopping Our Way to Safety. He makes clear-cut statements about only affluent people being able to purge their lifestyles of toxicities. People of middle and lower incomes cannot do such; therefore, they suffer more, from toxic exposure, cancer, etc. Furthermore, lower-income people, predominantly people of color, do not have a voice to fight these wrongs, in the political arena. I’m speculating when I state, that if white affluent families started to rally against the toxicities in bottle water, more people would listen (probably white men) but the same would not happen for families of color. There is evidence to support this.
I have read several articles and novels and watched a documentary, pertaining to Environmental Racism and Environmental Justice. What I took from it is that many people of color and low-income families suffer unspeakable horrors when they have no choice but to live near nuclear waste facilities and industrial complexes that are known to emit toxins in the environmental surroundings, which now include humans as neighboring inhabitants. These facilities do not exist in white-affluent-neighborhoods but in towns and communities, where the majorities are people of color. For example “Cancer Alley” which runs along the Mississippi in the river areas of Louisiana. Several studies show that cancer is more prevalent there then in any area of the U.S. and if you get an opportunity to watch a documentary on it, it’s well worth the eye opening experience. People, children and adults, suffer horribly and die so frequently from cancer, that a group of children, on the documentary, were playing with dolls, and took off Barbie’s leg. When asked about it they said Barbie lost her leg to cancer and she’s at her funeral!
Another serious connection is when, as a class, we discuss population issues and possible solutions to controlling it. No one really asks who will suffer more, who will be inflicted the most and who will be told to stop reproducing? Historically, marginalized women have been blamed for over reproduction and have been made to suffer for it. Articles I’ve read expose the fight for reproductive freedom and explore racism and the dilemmas around limiting population growth. Some of the articles are Racism, Birth Control and Reproductive Rights (Davis) and In Search of a Community, Three Tales of Pregnancy Loss (Layne) they pertain to marginalized women who were forced to stop reproducing without consent. One story includes a woman bringing her two teenage daughters to receive birth control, and due to a lack of informed consent, the mother signed away her daughters’ reproductive ability and they ended up having hysterectomies. Other stories tell of women of color, specifically Hispanic women, being subjected to experimental birth control, leading to in-fertilization and death. The stories seem outrageous but they’re all true.
There are too many accounts of oppression to address here, they are endless, but when we discuss solutions it’s so important to keep in the forefront of our minds and ask ourselves “who will benefit the greatest and who will suffer the most and why?”
Monday, November 16, 2009
Human Evolution Introduction
Innovation Requires Reward It Seems
Source:http://www.ajc.com/services/content/printedition/2008/11/05/parthemoreed.html
Sunday, November 15, 2009
It goes hand in hand
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Give thanks, recycle!
The American lifestyle has evolved into one of mass consumption. Its blatantly obvious just by walking around a town. Advertisements tell us that we aren’t happy because we aren’t eating a cheeseburger or taco or because our iphones don’t have the latest 3g network so we need a new one. Bottled water is a luxury that so many Americans enjoy, we spend 10 billion dollars a year on it. I personally find this number outrageous. If everyone bought a brita water filter and their own water bottle, the amount of energy saved would be enormous. Not only would we be saving energy but cutting down on polluting our planet as well. Some companies have started giving incentives for employees who bring in their reusable water bottle or show other ways to cut back on energy consumption which I find to be a great idea. I think that more incentives should be given on the local level to expand on these ideas.
The amount of plastic bottles wasted and not recycled from my suite alone this semester is probably enough to start its own landfill; I would not be surprised if this was the case for many other suites on campus. Recycling is a sure way to decrease energy consumption and pollution, but we need people to realize the importance of doing so. One possible ideas for campuses across the country is to see who’s students can recycle the most plastic. Turning it into a competition may increase awareness and participation, and some sort of reward would give the school a sense of accomplishment. Recycling isn’t fun and it takes some conscious effort to sort trash, so people typically wont do it on their own.
So on this thanksgiving, give thanks by recycling!
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Paradox-Veteran's Day
According to Jevons it is in regards to coal consumption and efficiency improvements in steam engines, believing that economical use of fuel is equal to diminished consumption, and in fact it is the opposite.In conservation, energy economics and green marketing it refers to the behavioral or other systematic responses to the introduction of new technologies, or other measures taken to reduce resource use. These responses tend to offset the beneficial effects of the new technology or other measures taken. The rebound effect is generally expressed as a ratio of the lost benefit compared to the expected environmental benefit when holding consumption constant. In Jevons paradox the actual resource savings are negative, the rebound effect is higher than 100%, this is also known as ‘back-fire’. An example is when the computer was invented there was a belief there would be less use of paper but in fact the use of using paper to print increased drastically. Also an increase in battery storage technology and efficiency improvements in production leads to an explosion of digital technologies increasing the demand for more energy and resources.
What would happen if consumers stop spending so much? There is a great emphasis on consumer spending because it is important to keep the economy going and also it controls the supply and demand of products. Consumer spending is necessary to preserve the economic cycle. There will soon be an economy based on debt peonage, with a great surplus and a lack of incoming. There can be a complete collapse which also affects our technological advances, and resulting in the US losing its title as a powerhouse country.
In Adam Curtis documentary Century of the self he mentions the concept “sea of selves”. I believe by this he means now people are so competitive and concerned with themselves and only helping themselves that they forget what it means to be a community. Especially in the corporate world where people continuously step on others toes to get to the top they often forget everyone else or their concerns, and never realize they may need those people once they get to the top. It’s as though we have conformed to this lifestyle of zombies in suits and we never realize they people around us, or those “below” us.
F.G. Bailey mentions there are 5 aspects of the human life and they include tactical, moral, silly, civic, and divine. As for civic he believes this is what brings people together, and what we are suppose to do as our existence on this earth. It is what makes us all the same, but yet and still different. The divine is the higher power, and the belief that our actions affect not only us and our lifestyles, but those that surround us and everyone else. It sets our responsibility for our actions at a higher level. Not only do we have to answer to ourselves but to a higher power. But these are both needed to keep stability and control in a society.
This essay was rather interestingly true and because of it truth it also frightens and saddens me. When mentioning the “sea of selves” concept it scares me that the society we live in is very self-centered and we all live in this box as to where we believe life to be. The sense of family and community has lost its meaning and we have become a society of soldiers where we take orders from machines and believe that we are supposed to live luxuriously at the cost of the “little people”. We’ve lost this sense of responsibility as a country, as America and continue to blame others and make others suffer the consequences. Because corporate America is such an important aspect to us Americans, we never realize what we’ve become, people on wall street look like a sea of blue suits and zombies, and though we are all for self there lacks individualism. It makes me question what have we turned into? And what has made us that way? We are more concerned with the tactical and moral aspect of life rather than the civic and divine. And I believe it starts from childhood when we are taught that we are wrong for being different, or just the idea of being wrong continues to separate us, but from what? Our level of intelligence? And whose to say what makes things right and wrong, because they are far from the normal. We have simply become selfish zombies.
Veterans day is a day we celebrate those who have served our country. I believe this article was presented to us on Veteran’s day because of the idea of war and where war stem’s from. War is based upon the fear of losing power and status, and the idea of “self-interest”. We no longer look to our neighboring countries for help and assistance but rather fear that they may be ahead of us, or become more powerful. Also with the economic aspect and the need of the consumer market. Because war is very expensive to a country we need people to continue to buy so we don’t fall into a greater debt especially in time of warfare when the economy usually falls into a slum. Hence, why many stores during veteran’s day conduct major sales to encourage people to continue to buy. And as for the soldier they are fighting for us all not for themselves. They’ve lost the sense of just self and understand their responsibility as a person and the power they hold and how it affects not only them, but the country as a whole.
Jevons’ Paradox
will become an unaffordable luxury. The risk of systemic collapse is very real for a
complex social system predicated on abundant energy. In this light, the drive for
improvements in resource efficiencies can be seen as a critical objective for state security
and preservation of the system of production. In an economic system that requires the
constant externalization of its true operating costs to sustain itself, every measurable
increase in resource efficiency will serve to perpetuate this "desires-based" economy.” Because there is a demand to increase the quality of life this makes us spend more and keep on spending. If we were to stop spending, then our “quality” of life would decrease. Javons’ Paradox also talks about the sea of "selves" and how our steadfast refusal to surrender illusions of freedom for the sake of collective survival and well-being are conditioning us to fail. This makes us feel that we would have to go back to civilizations before to even come close to saving ourselves.
Jevons’ Paradox states that there are five aspects of the human tactical, moral, silly, civic and divine. These are aspects which govern the dynamics within social groupings. Bailey's analyzes the Civic and Devine which he feels these are the center of social life, its reason to be. He states “The civic alludes to the set of rights, obligations and responsibilities that bind the collective to the individual and vice versa. The divine alludes to the notion of something greater than one's self and that the activities of the collective are significant in relation to the world.”
I liked the essay because it helps explain the pros and cons of saving ones self. While many people think it’s either one way or no way he explains that doing the same things but with less energy efficient is the right way to do it. This is somewhat a tribute to Veteran’s Day because it shows how they are fighting for us and for the “oil” we need to maintain our spending habits and maintain our quality of life.
Growth, Economy, and its Effects
Another example of this would be "Household appliances provide the best example that efficiency gains really do stick. Take refrigerators (which can use as much as 14 percent of a household's total energy). Until the late 1970s, the average size of our refrigerators increased steadily and then began leveling off. But, during the same period, the energy those refrigerators used started to decline rapidly. Today's Energy Star refrigerators are 40 percent more efficient than those sold even seven years ago. After all, there is a maximum size to the refrigerator you can easily put in a kitchen and a limit to the number of refrigerators you need in your house. In short, improvements in efficiency have greatly outpaced our need for more and larger storage spaces."
This leads into the why there is so much emphasis on consumer spending. Consumer spending runs the economy, and is the biggest part of the big picture of our economy, therefore it is very crucial. Without it, the values of businesses would decrease, especially small businesses would suffer. If nothing is being bought the economy would be put on old and would stop industrializing and there would be an excess of inventory due to production decreasing; as well as the stock market would go down and crash.
The sea of selves just states how we fear the harms that the economy can give to us, finacially and health wise although we don'd tend to do much to care. We care about ourselves and isolate ourselves and feel that we are "saving" ourselves, but in reality it is making things worse because other important aspects are being ignored.
Bailey's notion of the civic and the divine, according to Jevon, is "Bailey's analysis, any successful and dynamic community, organization or collective human endeavor must place the elements of the civic and the divine at the center of its social life, its reason to be. These are the social aspects of our personalities. The civic alludes to the set of rights, obligations and responsibilities that bind the collective to the individual and vice versa. The divine alludes to the notion of something greater than one's self and that the activities of the collective are significant in relation to the world."
I really thought this essay by Jeff Dardozzi was interesting because it had many good view points. It showed me that it really depends on the situation and brought up good and bad points about how we behave as both consumers and conservers as well as producers.
This was due by Veteran's Day because it shows us that the veterans are fighting for our rights, and for us..and goes with the whole aspect of society and whether they're concerns are within oneself or the actual economy.
jevor's paradox
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Jevon's Paradox... Vetern's day Sales
Another example I found in the article by jeff dardozzi’s Jevon’s,paradox on ERes. " improvements in efficiencies, such as with gas mileage or heating costs, invariably that savings has two effects. First, it decreases demand for an energy resource, which reduces the price of the resource. This then reveals a new layer of demand that, in turn, increases consumption of that resource.
There is so much emphasis on consumer spending because without the consumers there wouldn’t be a rebound effect. If consumers stop spending so much, then the decrease in price would result in the loss of the company producing the good or providing the service.
Sea of selves is what our society has become as described by filmmaker Adam Curtis.
This sea of selves means that everyone has become so selfish and that the corporate
world has become the survival of the fittest. The government and the corporate world
isn't thinking about the citizens and finding ways to help be a better nation. They
are looking ways to make themselves better off.
Bailey's nation of the civic and divine are the social aspects of our personalities. The civic alludes to
the set of rights, obligations and responsibilities that bind the
collective to the individual and vice versa. The divine alludes to the
notion of something greater than one's self and that the activities of the
collective are significant in relation to the world. jeff dardozzi’s
Jevon’s paradox on ERes. Jeff Dardozzi did a good job explaining the history of the paradox and how it effects the world today is so many different ways.
He mentions the topic of social norms, consumer demand and other nations that are on the rise of this demand.
Why this assignment due on Veteran's day?
I thought about it and read some blogs, I agree with with S. Soehl, and that it is ironic that the American public doesn't really understand the meaning of Vetern's day.
And to them it is only another holiday that there is a sale and they can spend their money and purchase the good that they need.